A source is the start of a claim
Official announcements establish published facts. First-hand gameplay can establish observed behavior. Community guides can provide valuable interpretation. These are different kinds of evidence, and a good article should make the distinction visible.
A source link should support the specific statement next to it. A homepage link is not enough to prove an exact collectible coordinate or a permanent lockout.
Keep uncertainty attached to the item
Hundo distinguishes official facts, planning advice, pending discoveries, and verified requirements. A requirement claim needs evidence for its effect on completion. A missable claim needs a tested lockout and recovery check.
The review date tells you when an editor checked the sources. It does not mean Rockstar announced everything on that date. Published dates and verification dates should stay separate.
Corrections make the record stronger
When evidence changes, update the claim and explain what changed. Preserve the item’s identity so user progress and notes remain attached. Avoid quietly replacing a wrong guide with an equally unsupported statement.
- Source links for factual claims.
- Platform and build for tested behavior.
- Clear pending status when evidence is insufficient.
- Visible corrections and stable identifiers.
Common questions
Can a source-backed claim still change?
Yes. Sources can be incomplete and patches can change behavior. The verification date and change log provide context.
Sources & verification
These links support the game facts or Hundo features described in this guide. The recommended workflow and explanations are original Hundo editorial guidance. Our review date is not an announcement date.
How we verify information →